+75.7%
LSCC vs RGEN
+45.2%
+30.5%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -1.2% | +3.2% | +2.3% |
| 7D | +1.3% | -4.9% | +6.2% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -9.7% | +5.7% | -15.4% | -10.9% |
| 3M | -23.7% | +32.4% | -56.1% | -30.6% |
| 6M | +26.5% | +33.2% | -6.7% | +12.6% |
| YTD | +57.5% | +2.3% | +55.2% | +55.6% |
| 1Y | +75.7% | +39.0% | +36.7% | +55.6% |
| All | +75.7% | +45.2% | +30.5% | +55.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling