+69.6%
LSCC vs FLNC
-69.0%
+138.6%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +10.2% | -8.9% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -2.1% | +5.1% | +3.2% |
| 30D | -19.3% | -20.8% | +1.5% | -16.2% |
| 3M | -22.3% | -61.3% | +39.0% | -9.7% |
| 6M | -14.6% | -50.9% | +36.3% | -3.4% |
| YTD | +45.8% | -69.4% | +115.1% | +65.5% |
| 1Y | +69.6% | -68.4% | +138.0% | +92.3% |
| All | +69.6% | -69.0% | +138.6% | +92.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling