+69.6%
LSCC vs EPAM
-15.2%
+84.8%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.6% | +1.8% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +0.8% | +2.1% | +3.3% |
| 30D | -19.3% | +24.9% | -44.2% | -15.4% |
| 3M | -22.3% | +22.6% | -44.9% | -18.4% |
| 6M | -14.6% | +24.2% | -38.8% | -5.1% |
| YTD | +45.8% | -33.0% | +78.7% | +71.5% |
| 1Y | +69.6% | -13.3% | +82.9% | +67.1% |
| All | +69.6% | -15.2% | +84.8% | +67.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling