+69.6%
LSCC vs ACGL
+28.7%
+40.9%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +2.7% | -1.4% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +8.0% | -5.0% | +10.9% |
| 30D | -19.3% | +17.3% | -36.6% | -6.1% |
| 3M | -22.3% | +11.2% | -33.5% | -12.8% |
| 6M | -14.6% | +18.2% | -32.8% | +1.1% |
| YTD | +45.8% | +15.4% | +30.4% | +75.4% |
| 1Y | +69.6% | +26.5% | +43.1% | +104.7% |
| All | +69.6% | +28.7% | +40.9% | +104.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling