+208.1%
LRCX vs ZM
+21.7%
+186.4%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +3.3% | +1.9% | +5.1% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +2.9% | -1.0% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +0.1% | +0.7% | -0.6% | 0.0% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -3.7% | -4.8% | -6.7% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +29.9% | +8.2% | +36.0% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +17.4% | +62.6% | +79.6% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +22.4% | +185.7% | +206.9% |
| All | +208.1% | +21.7% | +186.4% | +206.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling