+208.1%
LRCX vs TXT
-1.0%
+209.1%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | -0.4% | +5.5% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -4.8% | +6.7% | +5.6% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -10.6% | +10.7% | +8.7% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -13.2% | +4.7% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -20.3% | +58.4% | +60.0% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -9.3% | +89.3% | +91.8% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -2.7% | +210.7% | +220.1% |
| All | +208.1% | -1.0% | +209.1% | +220.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling