+208.1%
LRCX vs NIO
-37.4%
+245.5%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | -1.6% | +6.7% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -13.0% | +14.9% | +5.9% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -18.3% | +18.4% | +5.6% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -33.2% | +24.7% | +2.2% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -21.5% | +59.6% | +44.5% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -25.5% | +105.6% | +90.4% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -38.0% | +246.1% | +262.9% |
| All | +208.1% | -37.4% | +245.5% | +262.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling