+208.1%
LRCX vs NCLH
-38.5%
+246.6%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | -0.1% | +5.3% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -6.5% | +8.4% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -23.3% | +23.4% | +8.7% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -18.6% | +10.1% | -4.2% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -26.2% | +64.3% | +47.4% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -30.2% | +110.3% | +93.5% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -39.2% | +247.2% | +257.3% |
| All | +208.1% | -38.5% | +246.6% | +257.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling