+208.1%
LRCX vs MTZ
+30.9%
+177.2%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +2.1% | +3.0% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -1.6% | +3.5% | +3.2% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -11.1% | +11.2% | +9.4% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -36.7% | +28.2% | +31.2% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -21.9% | +60.0% | +64.4% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +9.1% | +70.9% | +64.8% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +30.0% | +178.1% | +171.0% |
| All | +208.1% | +30.9% | +177.2% | +171.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling