+208.1%
LRCX vs MDLZ
+3.3%
+204.8%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | -0.3% | +5.4% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -1.7% | +3.6% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -2.1% | +2.2% | -1.2% |
| 3M | -8.5% | +1.3% | -9.8% | -6.1% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +6.2% | +31.9% | +41.4% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +15.8% | +64.3% | +90.9% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +4.1% | +203.9% | +210.7% |
| All | +208.1% | +3.3% | +204.8% | +210.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling