+208.1%
LRCX vs GTLB
+14.4%
+193.6%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +1.1% | +4.1% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +11.1% | -9.1% | +3.0% |
| 30D | +0.1% | +37.8% | -37.7% | +3.4% |
| 3M | -8.5% | +61.6% | -70.1% | -3.2% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +98.9% | -60.9% | +49.2% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +32.8% | +47.3% | +101.8% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +14.7% | +193.4% | +266.6% |
| All | +208.1% | +14.4% | +193.6% | +266.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling