+208.1%
LRCX vs GLW
+123.7%
+84.4%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLW | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +5.7% | -0.6% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +3.8% | -1.9% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -1.3% | +1.4% | +0.3% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -21.8% | +13.3% | +5.3% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +28.5% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +77.2% | +2.9% | +15.6% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +123.2% | +84.8% | +77.3% |
| All | +208.1% | +123.7% | +84.4% | +77.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLW.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLW return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLW return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLW wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling