+208.1%
LRCX vs FLUT
-65.9%
+274.0%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLUT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | -2.2% | +7.3% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -1.6% | +3.5% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +0.1% | +7.7% | -7.7% | +0.9% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -0.7% | -7.8% | -8.8% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -11.2% | +49.2% | +39.8% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -53.4% | +133.5% | +111.3% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -65.8% | +273.8% | +276.8% |
| All | +208.1% | -65.9% | +274.0% | +276.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLUT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLUT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLUT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLUT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling