+208.1%
LRCX vs ENTG
+76.2%
+131.9%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +6.2% | -1.0% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +2.8% | -0.9% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -4.7% | +4.8% | +3.0% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -0.7% | -7.8% | -8.6% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +7.7% | +30.3% | +29.0% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +65.1% | +15.0% | +29.7% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +74.8% | +133.3% | +115.7% |
| All | +208.1% | +76.2% | +131.9% | +115.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling