-1.9%
LQD vs IEMG
+13.6%
-15.5%
-6.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | +0.9% | -0.2% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -3.1% | +3.5% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -10.3% | +13.0% | +3.7% |
| 3M | -1.7% | -6.6% | +4.9% | -1.1% |
| 6M | -1.9% | -3.9% | +1.9% | -1.9% |
| YTD | -2.2% | +12.4% | -14.6% | -4.0% |
| 1Y | -1.9% | +13.9% | -15.8% | -3.8% |
| All | -1.9% | +13.6% | -15.5% | -3.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling