0.0%
LQD vs ECHO
+40.1%
-40.2%
-3.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +3.4% | -3.8% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -0.8% | +2.4% | -3.1% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -1.9% | -28.0% | +26.0% | -1.5% |
| 6M | -2.7% | -21.2% | +18.6% | -2.3% |
| YTD | -1.3% | -17.4% | +16.1% | -0.9% |
| 1Y | 0.0% | +33.6% | -33.6% | +0.2% |
| All | 0.0% | +40.1% | -40.2% | +0.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling