+8.3%
LNT vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+108.2%
-12.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -3.8% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -8.0% | +7.9% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -3.2% | -27.9% | +24.7% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -74.6% | +70.5% | -3.4% |
| 6M | -4.6% | -99.5% | +94.9% | -0.1% |
| YTD | +7.0% | -99.7% | +106.7% | +12.2% |
| 1Y | +8.3% | -99.9% | +108.2% | +15.2% |
| All | +8.3% | -99.9% | +108.2% | +15.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling