+14.2%
LNT vs MSTZ
-63.1%
+77.3%
-18.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.3% | -9.6% | +11.9% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +7.2% | +0.7% | +6.4% | +7.1% |
| 30D | +15.6% | +16.6% | -1.0% | +15.4% |
| 3M | +5.2% | -74.7% | +79.9% | +5.6% |
| 6M | +1.7% | -43.9% | +45.6% | +2.7% |
| YTD | +17.0% | -84.0% | +101.0% | +18.5% |
| 1Y | +14.2% | -65.1% | +79.3% | +16.8% |
| All | +14.2% | -63.1% | +77.3% | +16.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling