+42.6%
LNG vs UMAC
+2.9%
+39.7%
-24.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.2% | -10.9% | +4.7% | -6.2% |
| 7D | -1.9% | -26.0% | +24.1% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +6.2% | -40.3% | +46.5% | +5.8% |
| 3M | +13.7% | -51.1% | +64.9% | +13.3% |
| 6M | +7.5% | -5.6% | +13.2% | +6.7% |
| YTD | +51.3% | +2.3% | +49.0% | +47.9% |
| 1Y | +42.6% | +7.9% | +34.8% | +39.4% |
| All | +42.6% | +2.9% | +39.7% | +39.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling