+17.9%
LMT vs LULU
-49.9%
+67.9%
-26.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LULU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -17.4% | +15.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -6.3% | -16.7% | +10.5% | -5.7% |
| 30D | -8.5% | -18.5% | +10.0% | -8.0% |
| 3M | +1.8% | -19.5% | +21.3% | +2.3% |
| 6M | -19.9% | -41.9% | +22.0% | -20.0% |
| YTD | +10.6% | -51.6% | +62.2% | +9.6% |
| 1Y | +17.9% | -51.2% | +69.1% | +17.8% |
| All | +17.9% | -49.9% | +67.9% | +17.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LULU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LULU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LULU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LULU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling