+17.9%
LMT vs KEEL
+169.0%
-151.0%
-26.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KEEL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +3.6% | -5.0% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -6.3% | +7.8% | -14.0% | -6.3% |
| 30D | -8.5% | -11.7% | +3.2% | -8.5% |
| 3M | +1.8% | -41.5% | +43.3% | +2.1% |
| 6M | -19.9% | +54.9% | -74.8% | -22.0% |
| YTD | +10.6% | +47.7% | -37.1% | +7.5% |
| 1Y | +17.9% | +177.6% | -159.7% | +17.6% |
| All | +17.9% | +169.0% | -151.0% | +17.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KEEL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KEEL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KEEL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KEEL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling