+47.2%
LH vs UMAC
+2.9%
+44.3%
-13.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -10.9% | +14.8% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -26.0% | +28.1% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +19.2% | -40.3% | +59.5% | +19.4% |
| 3M | +18.0% | -51.1% | +69.1% | +18.3% |
| 6M | +46.1% | -5.6% | +51.7% | +45.2% |
| YTD | +47.7% | +2.3% | +45.4% | +46.2% |
| 1Y | +47.2% | +7.9% | +39.4% | +45.5% |
| All | +47.2% | +2.9% | +44.3% | +45.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling