+94.0%
LBRT vs UMAC
+164.0%
-70.0%
-50.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -3.1% | +4.1% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -0.9% | +9.2% | +8.3% |
| 30D | +6.1% | -7.7% | +13.8% | +6.5% |
| 3M | -34.8% | -26.4% | -8.3% | -34.0% |
| 6M | -24.8% | +61.9% | -86.7% | -30.2% |
| YTD | +12.2% | +86.5% | -74.3% | -0.4% |
| 1Y | +94.0% | +156.3% | -62.3% | +76.3% |
| All | +94.0% | +164.0% | -70.0% | +76.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling