+43.5%
KDP vs UMC
+112.5%
-69.0%
-17.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.9% | -2.1% | +8.0% | +5.8% |
| 7D | +5.3% | -14.7% | +20.0% | +4.9% |
| 30D | +19.1% | -32.9% | +52.0% | +18.1% |
| 3M | +19.2% | -22.2% | +41.3% | +18.3% |
| 6M | +29.3% | +25.9% | +3.4% | +23.4% |
| YTD | +35.5% | +107.9% | -72.4% | +26.4% |
| 1Y | +43.5% | +115.0% | -71.6% | +33.6% |
| All | +43.5% | +112.5% | -69.0% | +33.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling