+289.3%
INTC vs NIO
-37.4%
+326.7%
-41.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.5% | -1.6% | +6.1% | +4.8% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -13.0% | +20.1% | +9.9% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -18.3% | +13.1% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -14.3% | -33.2% | +18.9% | -7.7% |
| 6M | +110.2% | -21.5% | +131.7% | +117.8% |
| YTD | +159.6% | -25.5% | +185.1% | +171.1% |
| 1Y | +289.3% | -38.0% | +327.3% | +349.8% |
| All | +289.3% | -37.4% | +326.7% | +349.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling