+13.9%
IEMG vs ZTS
-26.9%
+40.8%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +7.5% | -6.6% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -3.1% | +15.4% | -18.5% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -10.3% | +25.8% | -36.1% | -11.1% |
| 3M | -6.6% | +18.1% | -24.7% | -7.2% |
| 6M | -3.9% | -19.7% | +15.9% | +1.1% |
| YTD | +12.4% | -27.5% | +39.9% | +21.8% |
| 1Y | +13.9% | -26.7% | +40.6% | +23.3% |
| All | +13.9% | -26.9% | +40.8% | +23.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling