+38.3%
IEMG vs ZETA
+68.7%
-30.5%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -4.1% | +5.7% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +2.7% | -0.4% | +2.0% |
| 30D | +4.6% | +15.8% | -11.2% | +3.2% |
| 3M | +0.4% | +35.4% | -35.0% | -2.2% |
| 6M | +16.4% | +67.1% | -50.8% | +10.4% |
| YTD | +25.4% | +54.1% | -28.6% | +19.2% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | +67.8% | -29.6% | +31.1% |
| All | +38.3% | +68.7% | -30.5% | +31.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling