+38.3%
IEMG vs XLC
0.0%
+38.3%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -1.2% | +2.8% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -0.8% | +3.1% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +4.6% | +1.0% | +3.6% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +0.4% | -0.7% | +1.1% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +16.4% | -5.1% | +21.5% | +20.1% |
| YTD | +25.4% | -4.3% | +29.7% | +28.8% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | -0.6% | +38.8% | +39.5% |
| All | +38.3% | 0.0% | +38.3% | +39.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling