+38.3%
IEMG vs UL
-8.6%
+46.9%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -0.1% | +1.7% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -1.3% | +3.6% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +4.6% | +0.5% | +4.1% | +4.7% |
| 3M | +0.4% | +17.6% | -17.2% | -0.2% |
| 6M | +16.4% | -5.4% | +21.7% | +17.8% |
| YTD | +25.4% | +0.7% | +24.7% | +28.5% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | -9.3% | +47.5% | +46.7% |
| All | +38.3% | -8.6% | +46.9% | +46.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling