+38.3%
IEMG vs QS
-28.5%
+66.7%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | QS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -2.3% | +4.6% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +4.6% | -0.7% | +5.3% | +4.6% |
| 3M | +0.4% | -39.6% | +40.0% | +5.8% |
| 6M | +16.4% | -21.7% | +38.1% | +19.3% |
| YTD | +25.4% | -47.4% | +72.9% | +31.1% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | -28.4% | +66.6% | +45.2% |
| All | +38.3% | -28.5% | +66.7% | +45.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling