+38.3%
IEMG vs HUBS
-46.5%
+84.7%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HUBS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -2.9% | +4.6% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -5.0% | +7.3% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +4.6% | -1.0% | +5.7% | +4.7% |
| 3M | +0.4% | +12.4% | -12.0% | +1.1% |
| 6M | +16.4% | -11.1% | +27.5% | +17.5% |
| YTD | +25.4% | -38.3% | +63.7% | +28.9% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | -46.7% | +84.9% | +43.3% |
| All | +38.3% | -46.5% | +84.7% | +43.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUBS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUBS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUBS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUBS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling