+38.3%
IEMG vs ARES
-18.2%
+56.5%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -1.0% | +2.6% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -1.7% | +3.9% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +4.6% | +0.3% | +4.3% | +4.5% |
| 3M | +0.4% | +8.5% | -8.1% | -1.1% |
| 6M | +16.4% | +23.5% | -7.1% | +12.2% |
| YTD | +25.4% | -11.2% | +36.7% | +24.8% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | -19.3% | +57.6% | +37.5% |
| All | +38.3% | -18.2% | +56.5% | +37.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling