-13.3%
IBM vs KRMN
-59.3%
+46.1%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -13.5% | +15.2% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -10.0% | +10.5% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +14.8% | +3.5% | +11.3% | +14.5% |
| 3M | +8.9% | -36.7% | +45.6% | +10.2% |
| 6M | +12.4% | -47.7% | +60.1% | +14.3% |
| YTD | -12.4% | -53.3% | +40.9% | -11.4% |
| 1Y | -13.3% | -59.7% | +46.4% | -10.6% |
| All | -13.3% | -59.3% | +46.1% | -10.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling