-57.6%
HTZ vs LII
-28.2%
-29.5%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +1.2% | +0.2% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -0.7% | +8.2% | +7.6% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -12.6% | +60.0% | +50.8% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -24.4% | -30.5% | -53.2% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -28.7% | -18.3% | -43.2% |
| YTD | -55.3% | -19.1% | -36.1% | -54.1% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | -29.7% | -27.9% | -57.1% |
| All | -57.6% | -28.2% | -29.5% | -57.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling