+129.2%
HPE vs ZTS
-49.3%
+178.5%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -0.6% | -3.9% | -4.5% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -2.0% | +1.4% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -2.3% | +1.9% | -4.2% | -2.5% |
| 3M | -2.9% | -4.0% | +1.1% | -2.3% |
| 6M | +143.6% | -39.1% | +182.7% | +175.1% |
| YTD | +118.5% | -38.8% | +157.3% | +147.0% |
| 1Y | +129.2% | -49.6% | +178.8% | +174.3% |
| All | +129.2% | -49.3% | +178.5% | +174.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling