+12.1%
HLT vs ECHO
+40.1%
-28.0%
-11.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | 0.0% | -1.0% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -3.3% | +3.4% | -6.7% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -4.1% | +2.4% | -6.4% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -7.9% | -28.0% | +20.0% | -6.8% |
| 6M | +2.2% | -21.2% | +23.4% | +2.9% |
| YTD | +8.5% | -17.4% | +25.9% | +8.8% |
| 1Y | +12.1% | +33.6% | -21.5% | +9.5% |
| All | +12.1% | +40.1% | -28.0% | +9.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling