+133.9%
HL vs PCG
-6.6%
+140.5%
-55.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +2.4% | -4.9% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -13.9% | +15.3% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +25.1% | -16.9% | +41.9% | +28.2% |
| 3M | +22.9% | -14.7% | +37.6% | +25.7% |
| 6M | -4.9% | -23.8% | +18.9% | -0.4% |
| YTD | +7.8% | -10.5% | +18.3% | +14.4% |
| 1Y | +133.9% | -5.1% | +139.0% | +158.4% |
| All | +133.9% | -6.6% | +140.5% | +158.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling