+57.1%
GWW vs LII
-26.0%
+83.1%
-13.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.5% | +3.6% | +2.9% | +5.7% |
| 7D | +11.1% | +7.9% | +3.2% | +9.2% |
| 30D | +15.7% | -0.6% | +16.3% | +15.5% |
| 3M | +14.8% | -19.3% | +34.1% | +20.2% |
| 6M | +30.9% | -29.8% | +60.8% | +40.4% |
| YTD | +48.5% | -25.4% | +73.9% | +53.8% |
| 1Y | +57.1% | -26.2% | +83.3% | +63.9% |
| All | +57.1% | -26.0% | +83.1% | +63.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling