+115.3%
GTX vs VOO
+20.9%
+94.3%
-28.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.3% | -0.4% | +2.7% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +5.2% | +0.1% | +5.1% | +5.0% |
| 30D | -10.7% | +0.1% | -10.7% | -10.8% |
| 3M | -14.6% | +2.0% | -16.6% | -17.3% |
| 6M | +44.1% | +13.0% | +31.0% | +19.9% |
| YTD | +62.0% | +13.6% | +48.4% | +34.0% |
| 1Y | +115.3% | +20.1% | +95.2% | +69.4% |
| All | +115.3% | +20.9% | +94.3% | +69.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling