+14.7%
GTLB vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+114.5%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -3.8% | +4.8% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +11.1% | -8.0% | +19.1% | +10.8% |
| 30D | +37.8% | -27.9% | +65.7% | +36.8% |
| 3M | +61.6% | -74.6% | +136.2% | +60.5% |
| 6M | +98.9% | -99.5% | +198.4% | +79.7% |
| YTD | +32.8% | -99.7% | +132.5% | +24.5% |
| 1Y | +14.7% | -99.9% | +114.5% | +12.2% |
| All | +14.7% | -99.9% | +114.5% | +12.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling