+39.4%
GM vs ZTS
-26.9%
+66.3%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +7.5% | -2.9% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +12.1% | +15.4% | -3.4% | +8.7% |
| 30D | +15.2% | +25.8% | -10.6% | +9.5% |
| 3M | +4.9% | +18.1% | -13.2% | +0.9% |
| 6M | +22.6% | -19.7% | +42.4% | +27.6% |
| YTD | +14.4% | -27.5% | +41.9% | +24.9% |
| 1Y | +39.4% | -26.7% | +66.1% | +51.2% |
| All | +39.4% | -26.9% | +66.3% | +51.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling