-55.2%
GLXY vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+44.7%
-59.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.0% | -3.0% | -14.0% | -16.9% |
| 7D | -26.8% | -13.3% | -13.5% | -26.5% |
| 30D | -38.3% | -49.6% | +11.3% | -37.3% |
| 3M | -36.9% | -54.6% | +17.7% | -35.9% |
| 6M | -52.1% | -99.8% | +47.7% | -42.3% |
| YTD | -37.5% | -99.9% | +62.3% | -22.5% |
| 1Y | -55.2% | -99.9% | +44.7% | -43.6% |
| All | -55.2% | -99.9% | +44.7% | -43.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling