+123.2%
GLW vs ZM
+21.7%
+101.5%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | +3.3% | +2.4% | +5.9% |
| 7D | +3.8% | +2.9% | +0.8% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +0.7% | -2.0% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -21.8% | -3.7% | -18.1% | -20.5% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +29.9% | -23.0% | +6.7% |
| YTD | +77.2% | +17.4% | +59.7% | +79.0% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | +22.4% | +100.8% | +125.4% |
| All | +123.2% | +21.7% | +101.5% | +125.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling