+123.2%
GLW vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+223.1%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -3.8% | +9.4% | +5.7% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -8.0% | +11.8% | +3.8% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -27.9% | +26.6% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -21.8% | -74.6% | +52.8% | -20.9% |
| 6M | +6.9% | -99.5% | +106.3% | +11.5% |
| YTD | +77.2% | -99.7% | +176.9% | +78.2% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | -99.9% | +223.1% | +124.7% |
| All | +123.2% | -99.9% | +223.1% | +124.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling