+123.2%
GLW vs MDLZ
+3.3%
+120.0%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -0.3% | +6.0% | +5.5% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -1.7% | +5.5% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -2.1% | +0.8% | -2.3% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +1.3% | -23.1% | -19.9% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +6.2% | +0.7% | +8.3% |
| YTD | +77.2% | +15.8% | +61.4% | +84.6% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | +4.1% | +119.1% | +126.3% |
| All | +123.2% | +3.3% | +120.0% | +126.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling