+123.2%
GLW vs LII
-28.2%
+151.4%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | +1.2% | +4.5% | +5.1% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -0.7% | +4.5% | +4.1% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -12.6% | +11.3% | +4.9% |
| 3M | -21.8% | -24.4% | +2.6% | -12.2% |
| 6M | +6.9% | -28.7% | +35.6% | +19.4% |
| YTD | +77.2% | -19.1% | +96.3% | +92.7% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | -29.7% | +152.9% | +151.1% |
| All | +123.2% | -28.2% | +151.4% | +151.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling