+123.2%
GLW vs BLDR
-52.1%
+175.3%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | +2.5% | +3.2% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -2.8% | +6.6% | +4.5% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -13.3% | +11.9% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -21.8% | -12.3% | -9.5% | -18.5% |
| 6M | +6.9% | -31.5% | +38.4% | +13.3% |
| YTD | +77.2% | -36.1% | +113.2% | +85.9% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | -54.1% | +177.3% | +152.0% |
| All | +123.2% | -52.1% | +175.3% | +152.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling