+123.2%
GLW vs ARES
-18.2%
+141.5%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -1.0% | +6.7% | +5.8% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -1.7% | +5.4% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +0.3% | -1.6% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +8.5% | -30.3% | -22.0% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +23.5% | -16.6% | +4.5% |
| YTD | +77.2% | -11.2% | +88.4% | +80.0% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | -19.3% | +142.5% | +134.7% |
| All | +123.2% | -18.2% | +141.5% | +134.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling