+24.8%
GLDM vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+124.7%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -3.8% | +2.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -8.0% | +7.5% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -27.9% | +32.3% | +4.7% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -74.6% | +73.5% | -1.2% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -99.5% | +85.8% | -13.6% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -99.7% | +102.5% | +2.9% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -99.9% | +124.7% | +26.5% |
| All | +24.8% | -99.9% | +124.7% | +26.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling