+3.1%
GLDM vs UMAC
+2.9%
+0.2%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | -10.9% | +14.6% | +4.4% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -26.0% | +25.8% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -40.3% | +38.5% | +1.2% |
| 3M | -0.4% | -51.1% | +50.7% | +3.3% |
| 6M | -10.1% | -5.6% | -4.4% | -12.7% |
| YTD | -5.8% | +2.3% | -8.1% | -11.4% |
| 1Y | +3.1% | +7.9% | -4.8% | -3.5% |
| All | +3.1% | +2.9% | +0.2% | -3.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling